As everyone gets ready for the CIPD’s Annual conference in Manchester this week, I thought I’d provide a helpful guide for newer attendees on some of the various HR terms they may encounter and what they really mean
A series of academic studies which suggests there are universal “best practices” that an HR department should be doing to enhance organisational performance. These practices include rigorous selection procedures, allowing employees to have some form of ownership of the company, and a strong training and development ethos.
- Taking ideas that appear to have been successful in other organisations and transplanting them into your own
- The killer argument when a sceptical CEO or Finance Director questions your new HR initiative – “But it’s best practice!”
The Ulrich Model
An academic view, put forward by Professor David Ulrich, that HR has four basic functions in an organisation: Strategic (or Business) Partner, Change Agent, Admin Expert and Employee Champion.
The reorganisation of HR departments, mostly by re-designating middle-ranking HR professionals as “HR Business Partners” and creating mindless admin jobs in “Shared Service” call centres (often then outsourced to developing countries). Usually followed by further reorganisations of HR departments as “That Ulrich model is a load of (insert own term of abuse)”
Extremely large amount of information (often but not always created online) which is complex to analyse, but by doing so can sometimes lead to more accurate predictions of likely outcomes
Introducing new software to churn out employee statistics – such as turnover, applicant tracking or absence, and to give this data red, amber or green “traffic lights”.
There’s considerable academic debate about what talent means – whether it relates to an inherent genetic ability to do something or a willingness or commitment to the organisation and the work required. A related but separate debate is how talent management can be aligned to business strategy
- Pushing up salaries to retain existing staff and to attract staff from competitors (“the war for talent”)
- Moaning about the poor standard of candidates when you are recruiting (“there’s a lack of talent in the market place”)
- Giving some employees (“the talent”) better training and development opportunities than others
Feel free to add your own in the Comments section below…