Well, after much speculation, and a weekend of leaks, yesterday saw the publication of the Taylor Review into employment, entitled “Good Work”. Much of the focus has understandably been on the Employment Law implications (excellently summarised by Darren Newman) and there has been a mixed reaction to the proposals.
But one of the key things that struck me from the report was the implicit failure of HR Management over the last 20-30 years, in allowing this situation to develop. Taylor’s concept of ‘good work’ would not look out of place in any CIPD document (and isn’t radically different to the ideas of a Victorian-era Pope). But the fact that Taylor feels it necessary to state that:
· Flexible working is currently one-sided, in favour of the employer
· A culture has grown up of insecure work and unpaid overtime
· Employees and other workers are not listened to and often have no way to put forward their views
· Not enough time or money is invested in training and development
· The over-control of workers leads to problems with individual wellbeing
Suggests the reality – of what HR are doing – doesn’t match the theory.
So why is this? There seem to me to be five main reasons for HR’s failure.
· Clinging on to outdated ideas – like “Best Practice” – a set of theories that derive from a discredited 1980s management study
· A mistaken perspective, that sees businesses as some kind of corporate North Korea where dissidents (anyone disagreeing with the management viewpoint) are trouble makers to be removed, or re-educated via ‘employee engagement’ programmes.
· Alternating between scaredy-cat approaches where we hide behind “policy says no” and “we might set a precedent”, and macho ‘business partnering’ where we try to act like the corporate equivalent of mafia hitmen.
· Dehumanising people by referring to them as “human capital” (an oxymoronic term that reduces people to data on spreadsheets)
· Becoming obsessed with the process rather than the outcome. I don’t care which “Applicant Tracker System” is best or about the relative merits of an ‘e-learning portal’ v ‘online facilitation’.
I’m glad to see that the CIPD are having a review and consultation around our professional standards. But it’s how HRM is put into practice that worries me, and it seems we are way off the game in a lot of areas.